Elections / Politics
2011 Independence Day Open Letter: “Let’s Be Frank About This”
For the last several years, I’ve written an annual Independence Day open letter. Each year, I usually begin by pasting in a speech of someone else from the past, like last year was Theodore Roosevelt, relating to what I’m writing about.
This year, I’m not.
This year, instead, I’m going to be boldly frank. Honesty, is the best policy, right?
On Obama
Not a day goes by that I don’t see a single piece of criticism for our POTUS. Indeed, there are a few things we should be criticizing him about. Namely having to play this ridiculous game we’ve created in American Politics where every president must be a 2 term president to really get anything done, and can only tackle the big stuff his second term. Otherwise he has to play right-of-center, unless he’s GOP. My criticism of President Obama comes mainly from his unwillingness to just ignore this ’2 term requirement’, and instead played hardball with the GOP from the get go. Unfortunately people in this country have really short attention spans, many of which have no clue today what “Fukushima Daiichi” means, despite it being all over the news a few months ago. They forget it was GW Bush and Co. that gave us 2 wars (1 of which we DEFINITELY should not have been in) that cost us billions and too many lives. They forget it was GW Bush and Co. that gave us two tax cuts that drastically reduced revenue. They forget it was the GOP pushing for deregulation that allowed the financial markets to spin wildly out of control in an orgy of greed, and they forget that it was the GOP pushing for deregulation that allows big corporations to pollute our environment. I criticism Obama for not wiling to really step up and tell the GOP to go fuck themselves, and removing his lips from their asses. We could have passed an excellent healthcare reform bill… but kowtowing to GOP interests turned it into a watered down mush. We could have had a lot of things, had we not had to deal with the party of not just no, but HELL NO. It does not matter what is put forward by President Obama, the GOP is against it. Their mission is to see that a black man only serves one term as President.
Yes, I’m pulling the race card here because it seems pretty clear to me that the incessant anger and resentment of the President, and the constant idiotic challenging of his citizenship, stems from deep rooted racism. No, they’re not standing there chanting ‘hang the N*****’, but they are pretty damn close. John McCain, their Lord and Savior during the ’08 Campaign, may or may not have legally been an US Citizen despite the Senate saying he is. No one would question a white guy from the Panama Canal Zone running for president with a huge legal question hanging over his very own birth certificate that would have ended up before the SCOTUS. However, a black man from Hawaii from mixed racial parents one of which was Kenyan, well you bet your bottom dollar that we got ourselves a bona fide usurper. Shucks, if it was 1950, there would have been no shortages of tree limbs and other sturdy places to make him dangle from just for even thinking that he had a right to the White House. The time when racism was the “in” thing all across the US wasn’t too long ago. Some may say it died in the 1970′s, but it is clear to me that it still goes on today. I’ve seen it with my own two eyes and I’ve been disgusted by it. So while some Obama-haters out there may like to pride themselves as being colorblind, pointing out one or more token minority friends, deep down that ‘uneasy feeling’ they get when they hear him speak is not because of the teleprompter (which EVERY MODERN PRESIDENT has used), but because he’s black.
Will Obama get my vote in 2012? Yep. Because out of around 500 campaign promises he made, he’s got a damn good track record, despite occasionally having to kiss GOP ass. Which is substantially better than the GOP’s 2010 campaign promises. I will make one statement here that is liable to cause a few people some grief, but that is if you vote for someone in a campaign based off of promises they make, and not their character, you’re an idiot. I didn’t vote for Obama because he promised to do this or that, or even because of his “Hope and Change” movement. I voted for him because he was exactly what we needed now. Someone cool, someone collected, someone intelligent, and someone willing to do the diplomatic work needed to fix our horribly shattered image abroad. McCain just didn’t bring that to the table, and Palin made me want to leave for Canada. Obama, though, is articulate, intelligent, and has a good sense about him. Knowing how the political game works, I knew for a fact some of his biggest challenges would have to wait until his second term. But, he was successful in de-discriminating our armed forces, and is now forcing the GOP to play chicken: run the economy off the rails for a second time, or, do what is right and raise taxes. He will get my vote again, despite my being a registered Green Party member (and those in the Green Party can sit their asses down… until we get our matters resolved unfortunately we’ll be making strategic votes for time to come).
On the GOP
I’ve always been at odds with the Republican Party, but always respected the need for a conservative balance to the liberal ideas I adhere to. However, in this last year the Republican Party has gone off the deep-end, in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, New Jersey, Florida, Ohio, and Arizona, just to name a few. Their non-stop anti-union, anti-choice, anti-poor, anti-freedom campaign has really gotten me tired. I used to say if the best person for the job was a republican I would vote for them. Today, I cannot in good conscience ever place a ballot entry next to a republican name ever again. For me to explain in detail my disgust for the GOP, I would have to write a novel-length blog post. Let’s just say there’s enough out there in news articles to make my point.
On The People
Folks, it’s our 235th Birthday as the United States of America. In 235 years this small rag-tag group of colonies has changed the world. I would argue that not since the Romans has a single people had so great an influence far and wide. However, we need to decide now what that influence is. Right now that influence comes in the form of selective death. We kill some with bombs, and we let others die from oppression, starvation, poverty, and disease. We manufacture enemies, we use words but do not know the meaning of those words (like socialism), and we have become incredibly xenophobic. However, we’re the one of the last colonial empires on earth. We have military bases (colonies) all over the place. We’re constantly expected to be the world police, for good and for evil.
Well, we can change our violent nature and get rid of our debt at the same time. We desperately need to cut defense spending (which, is a misnomer, as it is often offensive spending). We need to make sure the UN is pulling its weight and actively pursue peacekeeping efforts through the United Nations. We need to be able to tell even strategic allies that their human rights violations are not going to be tolerated, and proceed with sanctions and the complete withdrawal of interests. We need to stop providing monetary assistance to anyone, and yes that includes Israel. We can send food, we can send equipment, but we won’t send cash. We need to first take care of our people at home, because our nation can only be graded by the welfare of our poorest citizens. We need to get off this idea that we’re “Taxed Enough Already”, and come to finally admit we like what we pay for by taxes: roads, schools, emergency services, infrastructure, etc.
We need to stop vilifying public employees regardless of union affiliation. I know it might be hard for some to understand, but once our tax dollars go into “payroll”, it’s not our money any more. If the police officers, firefighters, and teachers want to form a union, which is their constitutional right, and pay for it out of their paychecks, that is their right. It’s not supporting unions with taxpayer funds, as the TEA Party would like you to believe. It is those individuals freely associating themselves, which is their constitutional right. End that right, and you might as well burn the constitution while you’re at it. Telling public employees what they can and cannot do with their pay would be akin to your or my employers saying “We don’t like alcohol, so we’re forbidding you from using your paycheck, which is company funds, for that. If you want booze find another job.” Public sector employees did not cause the huge debt. It was deregulation and an orgy of greed. In short, it was the Private Sector.
We need to stop with this idea that the Private Sector is our lord and savior and everything can be fixed through that route. Do we already forget the days of child labor? We are taking for granted things like fire exits, 8 hour working days, and 5 day working weeks. Remember, the Private Sector isn’t looking out for anyone but Mr. Profit, and if that means having one less exit door, or not paying for breaks, or allowing lunches, or giving you weekends, they WILL DO IT. They have in the past, and given the opportunity, they will in the future. Some things are best public, some are best private. I would like to see more social-capitalism, but I can make do.
We have a huge challenge before us, if we are willing to take it head on. It will need us to do critical thinking, independent research and analysis, and to dare I say turn off the tube. If you don’t already have sites like Politifact.com and Propublica.org bookmarked, please do so. I also invite you to do something extraordinary. I invite you to re-register your political party as Green, and start participating in local chapters and online discussions. Only when we have a practical third-party can we hold Democrats accountable, and challenge the ignorance spouted by Republicans.
We can take back our country if we start demanding corporations be held accountable for their actions, remove their status as ‘persons’, make them pay their taxes, and tax the benefactors of their greed. We can take our country back when we watch chains and Multi-nationals die, and return to small local chains and local businesses that put their money back into the economy, that have civic pride, and are held accountable. We need another Wal-Mart like we need another hole in our heads, but we need more locally owned shops that have a steady stream of customers.
We can do this, if we want it.
Why Obama was spot-on on the Middle East
It didn’t take long for the masses, completely clueless about Israel/Palestine and the history there, to start making assumptions. The fact of the matter is although it’s easy to take the view of Israel good/Palestine bad, a full understanding of the history is in order. So, as a primer, please read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Israel
Ultimately though, Obama’s remarks on Israel and the conflict are spot on. Israel pulling back to the 1967 Borders (the Green Line) is important, but more so is stopping their occupation and settlement of lands outside of the Jewish State zone. People have been afraid to criticize Israel for this as it may seem anti-Semitic. However, that’s nonsense. Criticism is not hate. It’s time the Israeli people and their supporters admit that the practice of settlements in the West Bank and Golan Heights have made the tensions in that region worse. I cannot support the actions of the Palestinians, but at the same time I cannot blame them.
A two state solution is possible, and necessary, but it requires both sides to cooperate. Israel needs to evacuate illegal settlements inside Palestinian Territory, and Palestine needs to end the practice of using violence to combat the Israelis. Sometimes tough love means slapping two fighting kids up beside the head and telling them to knock that shit off.
Castle Rock Politics: District 3′s Disappointing Slate
So there is one thing I absolutely hate about small town politics: You basically get a half dozen or so identical candidates with some misguided resident thrown into the mix. You get business owners and what not who all have this idea that they have what it takes to venture into politics, but very few actually do. For starters, very few have websites. Those that do, those websites are both poorly designed or completely void of platform stances.
Why? Well, in a small town it’s often assumed that if you live there, you know the culture, and in the case of a place like Castle Rock, that’s typically Conservative Republican Christians. So, there’s no need for them to really dive in to the issues, everyone is the same. We see the same thing on the state and national levels, but generally the difference is there is an existence of something resembling the Fourth Estate to call the loonier ones out.
Which brings me to my breakdown of the District 3 candidates running for office in Castle Rock. Now, I invite the candidates to contact me if they do not like my assessment of them to try real hard to convince me otherwise. Now for a legalese type statement: y’all are public figures since your name showed up on my ballot. What I say is my opinion and mine alone. If you don’t like it, tough cookies.
- Jennifer Green – So here’s someone who at least has figured out what the Internet is. Using Twitter and a website hosted by Google Apps (not even a personal domain, a fail but at least she got the Internet part). Her platform is basically the same as everyone else’s: Growth, Jobs, Water, raise a family in Leave-it-to-Beaver-land. Unfortunately she couldn’t seem to find a photo that better suited her as a candidate, as it gives an awful first impression.
- Jobs: So she says she wants to create incentives for businesses to relocate to Castle Rock, but doesn’t spell out what that is. In my experience, this usually comes in the form of tax breaks. So, for not having substance, I give her a FAIL on her first platform plank.
- Transportation: Completing a new interchange to allow traffic easier access to The Meadows should be a “top priority” of the town. Actually, Jennifer, it should have been an innitial thought of the town when they were busy annexing land for developers to put up cookie cutter homes. Another interchange is all nice and good, but it really does not solve the underlying problem: too many cars. Park and ride: learn it! Our priority should be getting us back into RTD and getting cars off the road via park and ride. Jennifer gets a FAIL on her second platform plank.
- Water: Her priority says she wants to transition to a renewable water supply to attract business and residents. I really wish she would have elaborated on what “renewable water supply” means in her mind, so here she get’s a meh.
- Medical Marijuana: So this is her fourth platform – a vendetta against the herb. I’ve noticed that’s pretty big in this town. Which is unfortunate, because most of the information out there on MMJ quoted by most people is dubious at best. So unfortunately, she receives a fail here as well.
- Nate Schaub – So here is one guy that REALLY understands “Internet”. Great website, Facebook, Twitter, the whole shebang. Even has his own domain name “natelikes”, which is really rather unfortunate for a political candidate. I really don’t care what Nate Likes. I want to know what Nate Knows. Now this is where I get a little hazy on Nate. Nate doesn’t do a great job of spelling out his platform on his site, instead relying on some basic buzz topics like integrity, valuing the fact that tax dollars are ‘other people’s money’, and generally posturing himself to sound and act like he’s not a typical politician. Where Nate does well is at least seeming to be responsive to constituent questions and ideas. Unfortunately politicians cannot act as a pass-through for their constituents on all cases. Sometimes they have to recognize when their constituents are wrong and act on what is right. Out of all the candidates, Nate shows a little more promise. However, he is against the MMJ ballot issue to allow dispensaries in Castle Rock, on the basis that they “attract crime, [but also] repel the very businesses and retailers we need in Castle Rock to spark economic development”, contrary to both published reports by organizations including by not limited to the Denver Police Department (regarding crime), or real-world examples, such as Idaho Springs. Nate needs to do a lot better on solidifying what he believes, and needs to really consider his sources. MMJ dispensaries contribute a significant amount of money in state and local taxes, and when coffers are starting to look a little empty, refusing a revenue source on misguided information is foolish.
- Thomas G. Whittemoore – Doesn’t have really any web presence, beyond mentions in the paper, the CR Chamber Candidate Forum PDF, and an Q&A on YourHub.com, part of the Denver Post. So, right out of the starting gate Thomas is obviously a half-assed candidate. His idea on handling budget issues is to cut, or put programs or services to a public vote to determine if the citizens want to pay for it. So I ask, Thomas, what happens when it comes down to having a Fire Department or raising taxes? Would you really put that to a public vote? There are many important things in this country that unfortunately individuals see as ‘worthless’ and if put to a public vote many would not support them (“I don’t ever call the police, so we don’t need as many officers as we have. My house never burns down so I don’t need as many firefighters. I don’t have kids who go to school, so I don’t want to pay more. I don’t use trails or parks or libraries, so I don’t want to pay for them”). Thomas is also against the MMJ ballot issue (noticing a pattern?). Not much else is known on his platform positions, and really, if a candidate can’t even be bothered to put up a website or Facebook page, why should I care?
- MaryEllen Riley – MaryEllen is a little more sane on the ballot issue (MMJ) deferring to voters, but unfortunately does not actually give her opinion of what she thinks. A fail there. However, she also does not have any campaign website or anything to allow voters to get to know her, another half-assed candidate. She’s primarily a Traffic candidate, concerned mostly with traffic issues. Her main complaint? People speeding through neighborhoods. “Riley put her name in the hat at the urging of neighbors who bemoan the traffic patterns in their neighborhood in The Meadows. “People speed through the area,” Riley said. “You can’t even cross the street, cars are going 50 miles an hour. People want speed bumps because on every block there are kids in the street.”” She told the Douglas County News-Press. So… she was urged to run by her neighbors because of traffic patterns in her neighborhood. And her solution is speed bumps? Having lived in Tempe, Arizona who uses speed bumps on every residential street, I learned something: Speed bumps DO NOT WORK. They cause people to race as fast as they can between bumps, and if they have low clearance they suddenly slow down for the bump before moving on, or if they have high ground clearance, they just drive right over without any care. For the rest of us, they’re an undue burden on the suspensions of our cars. MaryEllen doesn’t even come close to being considered for my vote, for one showing no real effort to actually be a candidate, having some pretty bad ideas, and admitting she basically got urged into this.
Any of these candidates I would support? Sadly, no. Nate may end up getting my vote if it doesn’t go to a random write-in name. Only because of Nate’s ability to grasp internet communications, I can be the constituent from hell: a liberal riding his ass. Otherwise they’re all the same person in different suits: afraid to say what needs to be said; “taxes need to go up”, unable to say “unlimited growth isn’t all that great”, and unable to actually support their positions with facts.
We do have some time left before the election, so if any candidate reads this blog post, don’t get mad. Prove me wrong! Back up your opinions and be prepared to have them challenged. Actually state what your platform is. If you don’t have a website, get one. No one is going to take you seriously without one. And be more specific. I want to know real plans not more lame ass buzz-lines. I get enough of that from national and state level candidates. Local candidates need to have the cajones to actually say “this is what I want to work for”.
Election 2010 Update – Colorado Senate
Denver Post announces Bennett to win Colorado Senate Seat.